Post by account_disabled on Feb 24, 2024 9:47:35 GMT 1
Security no store managers. And you take the disk - and in its place, a new copy immediately materializes, as if you did not take anything. If you got into such a store in reality - only purely moral reasons could prevent you from cloning hundreds and thousands of movies for yourself. And those who have already entered such a conditional store will somehow calm their conscience. It is not some physical product that is being stolen. Nothing is lost, as it happens in a traditional theft. The statements of the film and music industry that every download of a file is lost money in sales sound absurd. The author can take any cinema, look closely at every film that catches his eye, but would he buy CDs with films for $3 million? No matter what. He would take a couple of films from the force, pay for them and leave. There are losses, but they are not as big as the companies used to declare.
Let's go further. Downloading the movie took the author only 10 Europe Mobile Number List minutes (and for most states in the US it would be 10 seconds, given the speed of the Internet connection). And this is the most real threat, enemy number 1 for studios and labels. Today, the entire media industry is stuck in yesterday and crawling slowly into the future. They still believe that people will pick up and want to buy discs within the next 5 years, and that a movie ticket will fully justify the $15 price tag. Netflix is the best they could come up with, but the studios are trying to get such projects out of the game, because they see them not as a solution to the problem of piracy, but as a threat to themselves and their traditional media business. The main problem that movie studios need to understand is to realize that everything they charge buyers for is grossly overpriced. The fact that the price of cinema tickets continues to rise is beyond the scope of itself.
How did they even think of setting the price of tickets at the level of $10-15 per ticket? Do they think that this will actually increase the number of people who will go to the cinema instead of renting the movie online later or waiting for it to be put on torrents? Instead of lowering prices, they raise them, arguing that the newfangled "bells and whistles" like 3D and IMAX are well worth slapping an extra $5 on top of your regular ticket price. They cannot understand that people want simplicity. Even physically going to the movies, getting to the cinema, already costs money. Going to a store and buying a DVD instead of renting online or downloading from a torrent tracker makes practical sense only if you really like "that's that movie" or you're a collector. If we consider the concept of a service that would suit the majority of modern moviegoers and just viewers in terms of legal online distribution of movies, it is a service somewhat similar to steam,
Let's go further. Downloading the movie took the author only 10 Europe Mobile Number List minutes (and for most states in the US it would be 10 seconds, given the speed of the Internet connection). And this is the most real threat, enemy number 1 for studios and labels. Today, the entire media industry is stuck in yesterday and crawling slowly into the future. They still believe that people will pick up and want to buy discs within the next 5 years, and that a movie ticket will fully justify the $15 price tag. Netflix is the best they could come up with, but the studios are trying to get such projects out of the game, because they see them not as a solution to the problem of piracy, but as a threat to themselves and their traditional media business. The main problem that movie studios need to understand is to realize that everything they charge buyers for is grossly overpriced. The fact that the price of cinema tickets continues to rise is beyond the scope of itself.
How did they even think of setting the price of tickets at the level of $10-15 per ticket? Do they think that this will actually increase the number of people who will go to the cinema instead of renting the movie online later or waiting for it to be put on torrents? Instead of lowering prices, they raise them, arguing that the newfangled "bells and whistles" like 3D and IMAX are well worth slapping an extra $5 on top of your regular ticket price. They cannot understand that people want simplicity. Even physically going to the movies, getting to the cinema, already costs money. Going to a store and buying a DVD instead of renting online or downloading from a torrent tracker makes practical sense only if you really like "that's that movie" or you're a collector. If we consider the concept of a service that would suit the majority of modern moviegoers and just viewers in terms of legal online distribution of movies, it is a service somewhat similar to steam,